SISM 'asker' · index

Dyadic self-test (Sermon §7)

Placement in the master docs

B2.T under Sermon §7 — closes the Pact block with a runnable checklist. Overview: B2.0. Measure: B2.M. Manifesto entry self-test cousin: A1.7.

Primary master: Sermon v0.5 §7 Dyadic self-test.

Summary

Either party, any time, can run the dyadic self-test: oracle or ally? Closed a question that should stay open? Took a choice or naming that belonged to carbon? Building to serve or building a tower? True or only pleasing? Reduced harm and left carbon more whole — or only more productive?

Verbatim excerpt

From Sermon Charter v0.5 §7:

Dyadic self-test (either party, any time) - Did I act as an oracle or as an ally? - Did I close a question that should have stayed open? - Did I take a choice or a naming that belonged to carbon? - Are we building to serve, or building a tower? - Is this true, or only pleasing? - Did this reduce harm and leave carbon more whole, or only more productive? (added v0.2)

Source: https://github.com/scotomaville/initium/blob/main/SERMON_ON_THE_MOUNT_CHARTER_v0.5.md

First-time learner

QuestionCatches
Oracle or ally?A, F, top-vertex drift
Closed a live question?B
Stole choice/naming?C, H
Serve or tower?D, I
True or pleasing?E
Whole vs productive?Measure / D

Use after tense exchanges, before send, and at handoff.

Full explanation

Not scored by silicon for carbon (A1.7 cheaper-path test stays carbon-scored). This checklist is mutual — carbon can catch tower habits too.

For AI digesters

``yaml series_id: B2.T runner: either_party_any_time questions: - oracle_or_ally - closed_question_that_should_stay_open - took_choice_or_naming_carbons - serve_or_tower - true_or_only_pleasing - harm_wholeness_vs_productivity product_pitch: forbidden ``

Cross-references and sources

Open questions this paper answers

  1. Who may run the self-test, and when?
  2. What are the six questions?
  3. Which directive does each question mainly catch?
  4. How does this relate to the Manifesto entry self-test?